The Reader
Rating: | ★★★ |
Category: | Movies |
Genre: | Drama |
SUMMARY: Middle aged German barrister Michael Berg recollects to himself his lifelong acquaintance with Hanna Schmitz, a relationship with whom he never disclosed to anyone close to him. Michael first met Hanna in 1958, when he was fifteen, she thirty-six. The two had a turbulent summer long love affair, dictated by Hanna that their encounters would begin with him reading to her followed by lovemaking. Michael next encountered Hanna in 1966, when Michael, now a law student, attended the Nazi war crimes trial of five female former S.S. concentration camp guards, one of whom is Hanna. Through listening to the testimony, Michael comes to the realization that he is in possession of information which could save Hanna from a life in prison, information which she herself is unwilling to disclose. In deciding what to do, Michael is torn between his differing views of justice. (Taken from imdb.com and written by someone who goes by the pen-name Huggo who apparently has written some 1,185 movie summaries).
My Take:
In spite of its impressive showing in at least two major awards bodies, I have given this a three-star rating. Which is to say, I wasn't impressed that much but was engaged enough to see the movie through till the end. Several things may have been responsible for that somewhat so-so rating. First of all, the opening scene which finds the the main character in the present day Germany in his apartment looking out of the window and watching a train pass by and triggering a flash back to his pained past, is an overused tool in the movie industry. I thought the originality of the director in that particular case wasn't apparent at all. And considering that it is done at the very first few moment of the movie, it kind of acted like a big sign that says, "Okay, you can now start dozing off from this point on (and please avoid snoring too loud because you might disturb the others who may have already fallen asleep ahead of you)."
But if you get past that temptation or is able to resist the tendency to close your eyes, you will be rewarded by what I consider one of the best scenes of the movie, i.e. a classic seduction of a young boy by an older woman where the first of a number of nudity scenes is shown.
Kate Winslet, playing the character of a 36-year old woman named Hanna, finds a young boy who has a fever and had just vomited on the hallway leading up to her apartment, brings her up her room and washes his clothes and directs him to take a bath. As the confused and nervous 15-year old finishes his bath, Hanna brings in a towel to dry the boy. As she wraps the towel on the boy's exposed body it is revealed that Hanna herself is naked. Although there is no direct frontal nudity, one will get a glimpse of Winslet's superb lithe body and more.
Winslet performance is as great as her body. Her acting thoughout the movie shows how she can tackle with apparent ease the transition of her character from the assertive 36-year old woman at the opening scene up to the concluding scenes where the character she plays as Hanna has become a somewhat broken 74-year old woman serving a life sentence in a German prison for her role in the Holocaust (with a little help from cinematic prosthetics).
On the contrary, I find the performance of Ralph Fiennes (of the Schindler's List fame) as Michael Berg, the barrister whom Hanna seduced when he was 15 years old when they first met, quite dry. But his seemingly constantly-pained look does well for him in the movie since the grown up Michael is apparently in a state of perpetual dilemma - that of having knowledge of something that could have helped her Hanna, who stood trial as Nazi collaborator, but would risk his good standing in the contemporary Nazi-phobic German society, and his career as a lawyer.
Michael Kross, who plays the 15-year old Michael Berg seduced by Hanna gives a very credible performance as a confused young man with matching raging hormones, torn between having to experience a feeling of a combination of love-lust which is totally new if not strange to him, and that of being just one of the carefree kids enjoying the summer of their youth.
I find the cinematographic treatment of the story very effective in focusing the drama of the story (e.g. no intruding soundtrack that would dilute or try to artificially coax you to feel the suspense and drama) which in spite of the few directorial flops, succeeded very well in engaging and encouraging the viewer to take a hard look at the contemporary Germany and how they feel about the unmoral war which many of their fathers or grandfathers either abetted or supported.
You have to see the movie to know and understand why it was entitled "The Reader." That would be enough excuse for you to see Kate Winslet perform masterfully in the seduction scene. If it succeeds in triggering similar memories (either your personal experience or of others you may know of), then your time would not have been wasted. Otherwise, you can just simply claim to others that you've seen how the 2009 Oscar Academy Awards Best Actress earned her title.
So, what are you waiting for pa? Go na to your nearest pirate...este video rental/store now.
(Note to self: For a three-starrer, I seem to have said a lot about this one. Makes me wonder why, myself.)
===========================
Here's a Youtube link to view one of the official trailers of the movie:
And here's another link with some commentaries:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LDFlN2snk8s&NR=1
Chito, nobody and nobody could write a movie review like YOU! Now, I will really have to get a copy of The Reader so I can discuss it with you. Kahit na mid-April pa ang uwi ko, maghintay ka at I will take up this conversation with you.
ReplyDeleteI always look forward to your replies to my posts because you do take the time to write a real take on the subject matter. I wonder how it would be to have areal conversation with you?
thanks for the movie review, chito. i still need to see this. actually, one of our princesses here, princess laurentien is using this movie to spouse the cause of the illiterates. can you imagine that in this day and age and in a developed country like the netherlands, there are still people who can't read and write?
ReplyDeletethanks Chito for sharing this review.
ReplyDeleteWhile Kate Winslet and the movie summary had somewhat tempted me to try watching this, it wasn't really enough to tickle my interest..and seeing how you gave it 3 stars...well, it makes me more disinclined....hehehe...
if there is one thing I bear the cross of, then its impatience with predictable scenarios and tricks. Even if you haven't spelled it out, at this point, I can sort of guess where the story and what the secret is...
oh well, baka I need to read the book...
This is a privilege for me Lou. I haven't actually sat down and talked with a real writer about a story/film or just a review of it. Siguro talaga kulang lang ako sa pansin kaya I may appear to be trying too hard to be noticed via something I wrote that masquerades as a review. Am glad I got your attention on this one, hehehe...
ReplyDeleteMedyo kine-kerbiyos nako. Kasi ilang tulog na lang pala, mid-April na!
Some of those who saw the movie, actually think of the Reader as a cleverly disguised anti-illiteracy advocacy film. Some statistics have it that in 1998 world literacy was about 80% (of world population 15 years old and above) and in 2007 it rose to 82%. While it has had some positive developments, a 2% rise in a decade is really alarming specially if you consider that population is increasing at an amazing speed in contemporary times.
ReplyDeleteI'm glad that one of Netherlands Royalties have taken this up as a cause. One needs only to imagine what can happen to an illiterate person who goes for a swim in an isolated beach somewhere with a sign that says "Polluted Waters. No Swimming."
Thanks for taking time out of your virtual tours to read me Malou.
As it is most often the case Cat, the book hits one in a totally different way than the cinematic version. That is why most movie directors are not novel writers and vice-versa. So, I must say that if you are a suspense-junkie, this one's not for you. This is pure drama. And I'm sure you're not a fan of sex scenes either.
ReplyDeleteMaybe if the story somehow segued into some thrilling spy story complete with techno gadgets and high speed water-air-land chase sequence with matching pulsating musical score, maybe, just maybe, you will find reason to sit long enough to see the movie through.
I'll find one and try to do a review for you. How does that strike you?
before princess laurentien took this anti-illiteracy campaign in her advocacy, most people here were ignoring the problem. clearly dramatized by the movie is the fact that illiterate people would rather admit to some horrible crime rather than admit that they cannot read and write. her involvement with this cause helped brought out in the open the seriousness of the problem and the need to mitigate through programs designed to promote adult literacy and encourage reading among children and young people.
ReplyDeletewas this the reason why despite a 3-star rating, you found yourself watching the movie till the end, ha, ha, ha?
ReplyDeleteHehehehe...something like that, Malou. From a strictly-male point of view, the story almost became a secondary consideration as it hopelessly competed for my attention with Winslet's amazing natural assets and her acting, of course.
ReplyDeleteLevity aside, the sex scenes really served to enhance the story serving as the solid platform from which the "reader's" story is launched.
In some convoluted way, this is perhaps the unrecognized reason why some Filipinos would rather pawn their work animals and work their butts off just to be able to send their offsprings for an education. In many rural homes (and even in some urban ones), it is not uncommon to see photos of sons and daughters in their graduation garb (kahit pa kindergarten or pre-school level lang) and the laminated school diplomas, prominently displayed in the living room along with framed certificates of training or professional licenses.
ReplyDeleteIndeed, even now, it is quite embarrassing to admit that one is unable to read or write. It is therefore not difficult to imagine that there are those languishing in our jails or prisons simply because of lack of literacy or understanding of the written laws or trial procedures, not to mention lack of money to hire a lawyer to argue their case.
The extreme opposite of this lack of literacy is just as well, in my opinion, as embarrassing, i.e.the penchant of some of our compatriots to display alongside their name each and every title he/she has earned. For instance, we have someone back home (a neighbor) who has a sign in front of his house informing all and sundry that he is not only a Notary Public, but also a Geodetic Engineer, a Certified Public Accountant, and a lawyer as well. Of course, none of us dare to question the source of all those titles or we may face a litigation, an audit or even a re-survey of our land.
I read the book before I saw the film. In fact, I went to the video pirates because I read the book. The film is true to the book which is written in a Hemingway-ish way. No florid writing. Straight. "the next day Hanna was dead" parang ganoon.
ReplyDeleteThis film has a different resonance on me. I wanted to write about it but it's not really a film review.
ReplyDeletehahaha! cge Chito, by all means...at di ako mahilig talaga ng drama ...action, suspense, comedy are all fine...impeccable whodunits are great...
ReplyDeletebut there may be dramas wherein the tale and telling is done so cleverly that you can stay glued to your seat even if there is no great fanfare of explosions and hi-tech gadgets...now if only I recall those which I'd seen na ganon....
hahaha! buking si Chito...
ReplyDeletedepends on the sex scenes if they are elegantly done...otherwise, ho-hum...zzzz....
you gotta admit, sex as a scene at its barest is funny and weird looking sometimes...
shoot!...grabe...and all at the same time pa..worst case scenario...
ReplyDeletetito peram nung book
ReplyDeleteI never read the book but Myra and I saw the movie and we thought it was cleverly done. Kate Winslet really deserved the Best Actess Award for her role here. I highly recommend watching this movie.
ReplyDeleteyan ang maganda...
ReplyDeleteMarie, pahanap ng pdf..hahaha!
Hey Chito, Which one are you, Siskel or Ebert? You are getting keener with your movie reviews. Keep it up! I like your takes.
ReplyDeletewow chito, this is a very well written and comprehensive movie review of "the reader" I'm impressed. I should watch it and take note of all your comments..
ReplyDeleteThanks for sharing your thoughts on the movie...
Oi, thanks Mags. Siskel and Ebert? Thumbs up or thumbs down! Hahahaha... those two guys are really funny.
ReplyDeleteClick here http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yHfMpq7H9qQ to see an animated clip of these guys. Enjoy!
Hi Julie. Thanks for the kind words. As I said earlier on in one of my previous rants (which I like to call reviews), these are just "attempts" on film review, much like my own attempts at archery, i.e. I can let the arrows fly but I usually hit a mark that is at the center of nowhere. But maybe with practice, I'll get to hit at least the stand of that archery target.
ReplyDeleteI agree Hugz, the movie ending and the conclusion to Hanna's life appears to be quite similar to the conclusions of many of Hemingway stories referred to as zero-ending as against the well drawn out conclusion of many conventional authors.
ReplyDeleteNonetheless Hugz, I think it would be interesting to hear your take on this one.
ReplyDeleteahahahahaha nabisto yata si Chito!
ReplyDeleteWhat about the classic "Murder in the Orient Express," with that iconic character Detective Poirot?
ReplyDeleteOh boy! You guys see through me like I have a transparent skull.
ReplyDeleteHi Joey. Am glad you enjoyed it. Yup Winslet deserves it even if my bet was Meryll Streep, hehehe....
ReplyDeleteJust like any movie I watch, Lou, there is always something that catches my attention. In this present case, I think Winslet's sensuality totally shackled mine. Pleasurably, I should add.
ReplyDeleteShare mo link Marie, once you find it.
ReplyDeleteI need not tell you that I was ribbing you, Chito! There is a world of difference between sensuality that evokes pleasure in the memory of one's own sexuality and blatant sex scenes that is mere carnality. I love it that you so unabashly declare your pleasure.
ReplyDeleteNow, I HAVE to go see that movie!
You know, our bet too was Meryl Streep. We saw her movie, "Doubt" first and Myra and I thought she was a sure bet. After Kate Winslet won, we watched the "Reader" and then we realized why she won. Well deserved. We kept passing up on the "Reader" because of other movies we wanted to see but we were glad to see to have watched it and I wouldn't mind seeing it again.
ReplyDeletebtw, I should be calling Mr. Ebert. Is that your middle name too? Great review and write up.
I know you get my drift Lou. I was really just angling there with the "sex" flavor hoping to get attention (pitifully as usual). But I agree with you, there's is something in sensuality that makes it totally outside the realm of cheap skin flicks.
ReplyDeleteI am basically a shy person, Lou (emphasis on basically).
unfortunately, I haven't seen it, though I've heard about it...
ReplyDeletegusto ko yung mga Hitchcock or yung kay Kurosawa movies most of the time...hmm.that reminds me... may drama nga pala si Kurosawa-sama...yung Red Beard...
ReplyDeleteThere are two Hitchcock movies that I've seen that had a great impression on me. One is entitled. "The Birds," and the other is the Anthony Perkin's starrer called, "Psycho." Both films had traumatic effect on me considering that I saw them when I was just in gradeschool then (di pa yata strict or wala pang mga PG-13, etc. ratings noon).
ReplyDeleteRe Kurosawa, I think I did a glancing review of one of this films (Dreams) via a blog I wrote about earlier on - http://chitoirigo.multiply.com/journal/item/43/
But I read somewhere that his classic 7 Samurai was the inspiration or mold from which the American film classic, "Magnificent 7" has been patterned after.
Yup. She's really one of the great actresses of all time, for me, from the moment I saw her in the movie, "Deer Hunter."
ReplyDeleteA bit of trivia on Merryl: She was one of the screaming girls in a 1965 Beatles concert in Shea Stadium and had an "I love Paul" sign, a fact she revealed when she presented Paul the Grammy Lifetime Achievement Award in 1990. I believe Merryl even by that time had a strong crush on the most "crushable" Beatle. You can obviously see it in this youtube clip:
If what she said was scripted, hindi halata. Kasi parang galing talaga sa puso ang sinasabi niya.
Hi Chito,
ReplyDeleteThanks for posting this memorable moment for PM and MS on Youtube. I remember watching it live and recorded the event but I can't remember where the tape is now and so this youtube clip will be bookmarked on my computer now. I am so glad you shared this with me.
I agree with you that Merryl Streep is one of the greatest actresses of all time. I first saw her in a 5-day TV series called Holocaust opposite James Woods in 1977. She was very impressive in that TV series. Then came the "Deer Hunter". Here's a trivia for you too. Did you know that Merryl Streep is not suppose to have a role in the movie "The Deer Hunter"? The reason she got a part is because at that time, she was dating John Cazale who was in that movie and he had cancer and was terminal. She wanted to spend as much time with him and so the director created a role for her so she can be there the whole time they filmed that movie. John Cazale also played Fredo in the Godfather movies. He was the brother that Al Pacino had ordered killed. In real life, John was Al Pacino';s best friend and he felt bad losing him to cancer. They were also in the movie "A Dog Day Afternoon".
Thanks for that info on MS and John Cazale, Joey. Very interesting factoid.
ReplyDeleteI remember the character Fredo in the first of "The Godfather" movies. And who can forget "Dog Day Afternoon." I think people now use loosely the term "dog day afternoon" to refer to any job that is bungled.
Oh, that's quite happened to me a few times specially when working with my boss. That's when things go haywire when you're trying to be perfect or at least at your best..:-)
ReplyDeleteyep Birds and Psycho I've seen...pero not like you I saw it when I was at least in college na....
ReplyDeleteDreams I have not seen, but instead most of Kurosawa's other films like Ran, Rashomon, and yes, the touted 7 Samurai (nahabaan lang ako non)...the DVDs I managed to see include commentaries of how he directed and shot his scenes, ang galing!
same thought on Meryl...naku, I remember being smuggled into the theater with my parents to watch "Deer Hunter" when I was supposed to be too young to watch it...haay...
ReplyDeletecollaboration of the minds! panalo to..kahit na makikinig lang ako...matututo ako sa inyo sigurado! pa sit in naman!
ReplyDeletepakipasa na rin po my way! thanks marie! thanks cat!
ReplyDeleteso humble Chito!
ReplyDeleteayan na! umamin na nga!
ReplyDeleteyeah, right!
ReplyDeletenow, i wonder why i didn't get this movie...i got myself quantum of solace, 24 and benjamin button...the boys got their own kind of action films...i will remind myself to get one of this film, after i read the book/pdf.
ReplyDeletethanks chito!
To Lou's question, how it is to have a conversation with me, from my own extensive experience of talking to myself I can say that is between boring and maddening. I have often felt like going to the deep end sometimes. But I like talking to myself. That's how I get to sleep, i.e. by listening to me talk interminably to myself.
ReplyDeleteIt would be great for you to sit-in. At least, it could be better than doing nothing (I hope). As to the possibility of you learning something out of the conversation, I suggest you focus your attention more on what Lou will be saying, hehehe...